"The only difference between the cases is that here the police climbed over a fence and a locked gate, whereas in ''Oliver'', the officers went around a locked gate. Given the cited language from ''Oliver'' it is evident that this distinction is not of constitutional significance. The same is true of Burton's claim that the police entry onto his land constituted a trespass under Kentucky State law. The Supreme Court, in ''Oliver'', addressed this issue, in the identical context of Kentucky law, observing in the case of open fields, the general rights of property protected by the common law of trespass have little or no relevance to the applicability of the Fourth Amendment."